Friday, October 12, 2007

Go "snag" yourself!

Oh, for fuck's sake.

Typically, I have nothing against the "wiki-verse." Wikipedia, for instance, is useful - and can lead to hours of "fascinated clicking" - but what is with some of the shit I've been coming across on Wikihow lately?

"How to Act Around a Guy You Like." Yeah. Nothing except a simple "be yourself" should have fallen under that entry. Actually that entry shouldn't even exist. Why? Because it perpetuates negative, stereotypical attitudes about gender, and relationships, and I'm so fucking sick of "Cosmo" culture that revolves entirely around "snagging a man."

In our "post-feminist" world, all the media geared towards women is still feeding us this constant bullshit that we can't function without a guy, that we must spend our entire existence fitting into cookie cutter after clichéd cookie cutter ideal of What Men Want. How to get a man. How to please our man. How to keep our man.

And it all comes down to shit like this:

"Don't show off - let him do that. While you think you may be "impressing" him, guys don't really appreciate when girls show them up. They need to feel like a man, even if they are just boys."

That tired stereotype is special enough to be offensive to both sexes on many levels. It assumes that men are insecure, sexist assholes who need to feel superior to women. It assumes that there's nothing wrong with men being insecure, sexist assholes who need to feel superior to women. That's just "boys being boys" Ha. Ha. It encourages women to stifle themselves for the sake of male ego. That puts women in a deliberate position of inequality to men. And what the hell is with that condescending final line?

And then there's this classic:
"If you think that he is interested, show him a little that you are interested too, like a little flirting, but not to over the top, you don't want him to think you're desprate! Trust me, that's not the way to get things done."
This type of neurotic advice is common and stupid. Flirt, but don't flirt too much! Be forward, but don't come on too strong! Make him take notice, but not too much notice! Second guess, second guess, frantically try to achieve some arbitrary balance, blah. It's the manufactured, phony dance of calculated courtship, the likes of which Jane Austen would have scoffed at. "You don't want him to think you're desperate!" - Well, if you're consulting a list like this, then you clearly are. And if you're desperate for a man, then a man is the last thing you need.

And this last one actually took me by surprise:

"Once you got him, don't let go unless he's acting like a real ass. It won't get you a good reputation at your school or whatever if you just go around dumping guys left and right."

The fuck? It is actually being suggested that a young woman in a relationship should stay in said relationship, even if she wants out (for whatever reason), just for the sake of saving face? This pisses me off for so many reasons.

For starters, why shouldn't a girl "[dump] guys left and right" if she sees fit? I'm tired of this bullshit "slut" double standard that flies around all the time - and usually from girls about other girls. I blame the patriarchy that female sexuality is still subjected to such scrutiny, and connotations, and ass backwards notions of acceptable behavior. It's 2007 and women enjoy sex. Get over it.

Secondly, nobody should ever remain in a relationship if they no longer want to be in said relationship. And they certainly shouldn't have to justify their decisions to outsiders. Besides, if you'll see above, only assholes make the kind of judgments the advice-giver is so concerned about.

Third, what exactly constitutes "acting like an ass," anyway? It's very subjective - what might be shitty behavior for one person, another might find perfectly acceptable. To me, "acting like an ass" is writing hackneyed advice about "snagging a man."

This is so beyond overdone, by now. Enough "You need a man" brainwashing. Enough clichéd flirting and dating tips. Can't we move on from these stupid, juvenile games and just be real? I like myself the way I am, and if I want to be with somebody (I will never need to), why should I have to slip into some bogus gender role and proceed to manipulate? Worthwhile guys are not interested in all the stupid trappings. They want to get to know you.

... And people wonder why the only "Women's" magazine I read is Bitch...

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Yes exactly, in some moments I can phrase that I agree with you, but you may be making allowance for other options.
to the article there is still a suspect as you did in the fall publication of this beg www.google.com/ie?as_q=microsoft windows royale 2007 ?
I noticed the axiom you suffer with not used. Or you use the pitch-dark methods of helping of the resource. I have a week and do necheg